Religion of Love

Virtue Doctrine » General Virtue Doctrine » PQR » Problem Solving  (Previous | Next)

Problem Solving

[1785] The greatest complexity is to find in L. To explain this and other worlds, one does not get out of a study of L, as long ze sends the key ideas. The most complex processes we find in living organisms, but it involves only processes passing through. The most complex structures we find in mathematics. Since they largely consider only a few substances, we need coercively philosophy.

[1786] It is a special attraction to consider the most complex structures and processes. But we should not forget thereby that it is not to understand them that is needed to solve the most important problems, but to enforce the crucial ideas, which are mostly simple. But justice can be only established on a large scale when complex optimisation problems are solved.

[1206] If we have found out something important (together with L), we should consider whether we record it. Thus, we gain an overview of what was said and can pursue our state of development. We should make a list of the major pending problems that others or we want to solve, and consider strategies for their solution. For this, we can create a suitable database.

[1207] If we get down the presuppositions of every problem that must be given to solve it, we defend ourselves from getting unnecessarily carried away. We should also consider with whom we team up to tackle a problem. We make a check on the internet who devotes or has devoted zerself with our or a similar problem in order to avoid multiple work and to not disappoint ourselves.

[1208] But we should not make use of L, since ze can expect that we work independently. We should have learned in our work to concentrate on the essentials. Difficult problems we break up into subproblems, which we solve separately. We recognise when we are unable to solve a problem with the means at our disposal, and we then consider alternatives. We know that every important problem is solvable.

[1209] This follows directly from the divine order, which determines that every creature can lead a good life in each world according to its Karma if it endeavours accordingly, since L has then no reason to deprive it of something important in life. We thoroughly inform us about learning and problem solving strategies in order to be able to be successful. From them we choose the ones suitable for ourselves and apply them appropriately.

[1210] We expand our horizons by getting other opinions, especially when we are insecure. For, there is nothing more fatal than to make a crucial mistake at the beginning that makes our whole work worthless. If we look over the border of the immediate problem area, we can collect valuable incitations. This is just as necessary as shining on our problem from all sides.

[1211] Even if we meet again and again with (almost insurmountable) obstacles in our work, we should not just push a important problem aside. In order to have lifts, it is advisable to make a package of problems with all degrees of difficulty, on which one is working parallel. I have worked on some problems about that I reflected more than 25 years - a long time.

[1212] Through persistency and rethinking again and again de novo even they could be solved. One finds admittedly not always the expected solution, but still one with that the problem can be viewed to be done for oneself. It is a very satisfying feeling if one faced difficult problems and solved many of them. One reaches this way the fulfilment longed for, which does not arrive, if one only lives for the moment or anything like that.

[1213] For, if others can benefit from the solutions one achieved, the positive mood strengthens again. Important problems are always ones that are important for others equally. Every existential problem that one has only oneself, one has to attribute to zis (bad) karma. For, L knows exactly what ze expects of whom. To solve problems is a life task, which we should not circumnavigate by an appeal to L.

[1214] For, what do we do when all problems are solved? L has by the way solved all our problems that can be solved. It pleases zer to see when we cope with them how. We are measured by how we mastered our life under the encountered conditions. Solved problems are on the credit side of our karma account. If we solve problems of others, we appear on their credit side.

[1215] L builds an overall account. The more often ze finds our name on the credit side, the more ze is in the debit side. If we behave properly, we can unhinderedly fill the credit side: Why should someone thwart us? To do this we need to see the things properly and refine ourselves. For, a misjudgement leads inescapably to barriers, by which we can recognise whether we are right.

[2029] One should consider carefully what one talks over with L. However, this should be done without cramp. There must be time left for the casual conversation. Primarily, one should talk things over with L that are urgent, and where zis help is required because the problem in question cannot be solved otherwise. Here, however, always is to consider that a preference or disadvantage is out of the question.

[2030] Therefore, it is convenient to agree on a corresponding equivalent for a service. The equivalence is important and one should not try to call it in question by corresponding actions or circumstances. It is idle, if one wants to belie L about the truth and it is therefore necessary to view and assess the situation right. Every interaction with L succeeds the better the more one has refined oneself.

[2031] In the mutual contact, the individuality of each other is to respect and to be adapted to. One cannot expect that L is available every day with infinite patience, always good-humoured, and that there is nothing ze would like to do better than to meet the wishes of the creatures. It is indeed possible for zer to confront one as unit, adapted and attuned to one, but there are presuppositions.

[2032] These units are not machines, but they are sensitive as well as the creatures. They have needs and desires how one should behave towards them. The more complex the creatures are the more complex also the unit must be that confronts them. If the unit should meet certain requirements, it must also have the properties to be able to do so. Consequently, it deserves respect as L zerself does.

[2033] It makes no sense that L offers oneself reduced units that meet their tasks then poorly. L expects that one tries to solve a problem first oneself before one appeals to zer, since ze did not equip one without reason with all the properties that one possesses. But ze knows very well that certain problems must be solved within a certain time and require zis help urgently.

[2034] The time in that a living entity can solve a problem is limited in each world, since all time over is finite. Therefore, it is impossible for any living entity to accelerate or to slow down something beyond a certain amount. Who tries anyway, has to bear the (unpleasant) consequences of zis actions. Everything needs its time. Therefore, one should often pause and consider what to tackle how next.

[2035] If one has recollected and gathered oneself, one can start to formulate the pending problem so that from the formulation clearly follows why L is met with the problem. The more clearly one has worked this out, the lower is the risk that one might have solved the problem still oneself and thus would have absorbed L unnecessarily. L knows exactly what we need. For this reason, ze will always help us, if necessary.

[2036] The presuppositions have to be right, however. It are, in the first place, the refinement of oneself, and, in the second place, the relationship with L that let one understand why something happens how. There is no phenomenon that is totally inexplicable, since each world was created with the sense and reason of L. If something is declared this way, the effort is missing the creatures shall make in order to understand something sufficiently and comprehensively.

[2037] There are problems in every world whose solution requires decades of work, even if several persons ally. All crucial problems can be solved more or less immediately, albeit with the help of L, and not always optimally. That they are not solved in the desired time is alone due to the creatures. For, L has calculated every world before its creation and is precisely in pursuit of its development.

[2038] If the creatures would spend more time on divesting themselves of all what separates them from a fulfilling life, and turning to that what gives fulfilment, they were already significantly closer to their goal as they are today. But since they often do not even have a goal and do no more than what is absolutely necessary, they make no headway. In the course of this, the necessary effort would even not be big. They are like that.

[1973] It is crucial that politics addresses the really important problems of the world and does not be confined to political cosmetics. Humans have a right to it and know exactly where only the bare necessities are done. To this end, only the will must be there. Everyone can build it easily if ze liberates from the comfort and develops and elaborates via relationship with L the right view of things.

[1974] Responsible political leaders solve the problems of the whole world and do not only pursue client politics. They remove successively the unjust distribution of resources and involve as many as possible in the political decision-making process. They are about the political success, rather than mere accumulation of power. They know who has true wisdom and listen to those who know what the next political steps are.

[1975] It is often necessary to take the uncomfortable way to bring about success. All the better it is when it appears, and one has the feeling of having really achieved something. Who does only do that where ze promises zerself the consent in their own ranks does not do enough. It is the consent of L that counts. L is on the side of all creatures and knows where the biggest problems are. Therefore, keep in with zer.

[1976] One does well to think things once unconventionally to recognise where one is on paths too entrenched. The most important must remain determining, but only the thorough walkthrough brings the solution hoped-for, since one can justify oneself, moreover, more easily. Who banks on quick successes with little effort should take the complexity of the world into account. It leads to the sustainable solution of the problems.

[1977] A solution must not be understandable in detail for everybody, but surely for the one who brings with the corresponding presuppositions. The more relevant a problem is, the more effort must be invested in its solution. It is inappropriate to put minor solutions of problems to the forefront, to document this way that one has done something decisive and can justify oneself this way.

[1978] Important problems should not be talked down or be discounted by pointing out that they are too difficult to be solved, especially in this world. L has made the world so that every decisive problem can be solved by the creatures in it. So excuses are inappropriate. Who only takes heed that ze remains popular does, by far, not achieve enough. Ze becomes guilty concerning those whose problems ze lets unsolved.

[1979] Some problem solution requires to forego certain things. Who is not ready to forego when it matters, will be guilty concerning those who benefit from this waiver. It is crucial how one behaves oneself and not how the others do. Every creature is responsible for its life before L, and for that what it has done for others. The wrong behaviour of others does not justify one's own.

[1980] It does not matter here if those who behave wrongly are in the majority. Every creature is to set an example to others through its behaviour. Only when there will be more and more who want to go the right way, there may be a decisive change. Therefore, it is so important to bandy the word of L about. But as long as one can adhere to the old way without consequences, nothing will change.

[1981] Many can carry out the word of L into the world, only the enunciator can write it down. It is his task to develop as many good ideas as possible and to write them down. Its environment is responsible for picking them up and putting them into action. This still cannot be also done by the enunciator, since his actual task is more important than the implementation. In it, he is irreplaceable. Who believes to be able to do it better show this.

[1982] The enunciator also does not need to teach the doctrine existing in the word of L, since this is the task of teachers. But he must surely answer the questions that will reveal an unclear point in the doctrine. He also needs to solve any theological problem of this world of rank and to add this solution to the word of L. He also has carefully to correct errors that are contained in the word of L.

© 2006-2010 by Boris Haase

Valid XHTML 1.0 • Disclaimer • imprint • • pdf-version • questionnaire • bibliography • subjects • definitions • php-code • sitemap • rss-feed • top