Religion of Love




Virtue Doctrine » Negative Virtue Doctrine » EF » Evil and Sin  (Previous | Next)



Evil and Sin

[152] L gives us the freedom to improve our fate. If L once recognised that we do everything for zer, ze gives us zis whole benevolence and a merciful fate. We cannot commit ourselves ultimately to the impersonal power of evil, since L stands above this and inserted certain downlocks into us against it.

[542] What to do when I discover bad and even evil aspects in me? Even L has such aspects. So the right dealings are in demand. An improvement should always be possible. If my acting in its intentions and attitudes points always in the right direction, or can be aimed for this, nothing should stand in the way of a positive development. Virtue doctrine and other people can help here.

[543] Even if I discover the evil and bad in my immediate environment - for example in the family - this does not mean that a positive development is not possible. Thereto, L has given us by zis grace fortitude. Who can understand this has already this power. There are many examples in that a positive development has succeeded, even if the way to the highest development is difficult.

[544] The best example and role model is L zerself, who is waiting for us. Ze estimates the selfishness low and has especially for stinginess little sympathy. In the world there are enough resources for everyone. So a dignified life is possible for everyone at any time. But this assumes that our world is changing fundamentally. If the armament would be reduced to the essential, it would, for example, be gained a lot.

[153] Even the worst criminal has a good core. L lets such criminals suffer at their own doings, because this is righteous. But ze determines, how this suffering looks like and how long it lasts.

[182] If sin is to mean the separation from L, then there is no sin, since even the absolutely convinced atheist can be never separated from L and one does not separate by a, however, natured act from L. We can disappoint L by our doing, since we have the free will to this. Therefore, the term of sin is used at most negatively in the religion of love.

[183] Also as contravention of norms and/or as acting against L the sin term has little expressiveness, since a decision against the conscience and against the word of L is nothing, what L does not compensate or cannot forgive. L does not require repentance and penitence (which one can feel by all means), but the insight to have acted wrongly and the reparation under L.

[184] Reparation is here reducing the consequences or redress and the unusual effort at the word of L. The word of L is revealed by this religion. The effort is, thus, not possible for the world without religion - a missing reference to L does not do justice to L and the world. Atheism and agnosticism are an underdeveloped form of man and miss whose aim (service at L) of life (this is a revealing of L).

© 2006-2008 by Boris Haase


Valid XHTML 1.0 • Disclaimer • imprint • mail@relil.de • pdf-version • questionnaire • bibliography • subjects • definitions • php-code • sitemap • rss-feed • top